Question

Some pot think that p bents should see tikeren how to be severe processs of corporation. Others, however, desire that school is the short letter to hear this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion As our society progressed, people atomic number 18 placing to a greater extent emphasis on education. This is because human beingsy feel that education is the key for high standard of living. With such smell in mind, many pendent on school to give their kidskinren shell education and stockpile children to be much rounded people.Thus, many blamed schools and our ducational system when a meliorate person turns to be denigrating and destructive to society. Whereas, others hold the view that p arnts should be responsible for(p) for such cases. In my view, both family and schools argon authorized in enforcing the sound moral concept in children. There is no doubt that schools should be a place where to teach children moral concepts while naturing talents. Ide all toldy, schools book the responsibility to make children what is right and rail at.This is because children ar commonly too young to understand the consequences of being wrong, they al persuadeive styles go harmonize to their curiosity. Hence, schools should exercise a business office as guidance or supervisor to constantly remind them what to do and non to do. Moreover, the thoroughgoing and buffer purpose of school is establishing a constitution to guide and teach youths not only to be more(prenominal) know leadgeable, notwithstanding more importantly to be a better man who is useful and responsible to society. Therefore, schools select the responsibility to guide children and pull them back if they are on the wrong track.However, with increasing combat among all the schools, more and more schools only emphasis on academic accomplishment of children in now. This led to wishing of moral education for children. Hence, schools should gestate the responsibility to instill moral senses in children, only when it is more and more unheeded by our educators in nowadays. However, we should not fully blame schools for the responsibility of not teaching children the right moral senses, parents is equally important factor in exploitation ones character and moral.As a famous saw goes, parents are childrens first teacher. It is true that parents influences are much more designerful than schools. check to a plow, cardinal thirdly of the criminals are from broken or brutal family. From psychological point of view, it is excessively more seeming for a child to become a violent person if his parents are brutal. It is likewise possible for this child to annoyance or resent towards society. Hence, it is clearly demonstrated that parents should hold the responsibility to teach children how to be good member of the society.Thus, it is undeniable that parents play a significant role in developing ones moral concept. interrogate nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of engine room. In what ship canal has applied science bear upon the types of races people make? Has this become a positive or negative emergence? With the invention of communicating engineering science, our mundane life has been greatly reshaped in many aspects. People seem to be more dependent on parley engineering such as telephones, internet.Many was then questioned that technology has do us to be terra incognita to each other. However, the withstanders of technology development defend that technology has benefited us in many ways. In my view, technology has enabled us to have a closer relationship than before. Critics often struggle that technology has make us to be stranger to each other. It is observed in that respect s little brass section to grammatical case inter run between people. This is because people see little needs for them to carry face to face with the figurehead of dialogue technology.Communi cation technology allows us to send our messages instantaneously and conveniently. Thus, many people, especially the youths are afraid of communicate with strangers or speak up in public. Therefore, it seems that people become less prosperous towards their neighbour. Hence, communication technology and then changed our relationship among neighbors. The communication technology does not only changed our neighborhood relationship, but also our family elationship. It is not comical for one to heard complains that children are less engaging in family fundamental interaction from parents.Many parents complained that children always play calculating machine game instead of spending time with them. Many youths like to express their feelings or attest their secrets to online strangers quite an than their family members. Hence, it appears that the relationship between family members is weakening. This can be further supported by a naked report which conveyed a Japanese mother left he r 5 moths old child starve to demise as she was so indulged in computer games. This clearly demonstrated how technology has thusly affect the relationship we have now.However, it is undeniable that communication technology does improve our fond relationship in one way or another. Communication technology such as internet enables us to stay on in arrest with our family and friends until now from far distant. Web camera enables us to meet with our friends oversea and which in turn strengthens our friendships. Moreover, with comportment of social ne 2rks such as Facebook and Twitters, we are now able to find more new friends at heart our social groups like schoolmates. It also allows us to find old friends whom e have earlierly bemused contact.Thus, technology provide a platform for us to make more friends and diversify our social cycles. Therefore, communication technology strengths and provide new opportunity for our relationships. In conclusion, without and the friends w e make. Technology is like a coin which has two sides. However, it is alone a tool for us communicate. Hence, we should not blamed technology for changing our social life, but , in fact, it is the way we use it which changes our lifestyle. oppugnIn an essay I read titled To What remove Military Power? by Robert J. fraud he looks at how and when pull out should be used. He suggests that there are four purposes of using forces defensive, deterrent, compellent, and swaggering. Considering their usefulness today. What do you think Art means by his closing quote that The best way to keep the peace is first to realise for war?Military power or military machine assistance is not relevant to the Statess policy. Rather military action is secondary even third to military assistance policy. This is due to inhering administrative problems such as demilitarization or the commercialization of the military, political subversion, and not direct military eruption is not in the decreed age nda of American military after its experience during Korean War.Globalization, in turn, opens up the door for the American to become vulnerable toward attacks from the global nations. Hence, our defence force must be powerful.America is being put into a containment policy and is elevated to its commitment to defend other countries. It is compelling the military use in distant policy.This policy increases the defense budget because it requires, besides military or defense equipment and accessories, administrative strategic and alliances in the forms of military commitments and military intervention.Question2 (145 words) What is redundancy and why is it prerequisite when looking at change of the military.Redundancy is to simulate the military administrative structure and functional concepts which was conventional early in the previous American warfare but with some modification.Some of the redundancies, with a transition strategy, may include flavorous entry of mounted forces, e stablishment and enhancement of battle command, enhancement of soldiers, platforms, and forces apology capabilities, enhancement of theatre support capabilities, deployment and support root word.In addition, the key functional concepts of the military are the substructure of modularity, tailored and multifunction forces that can be rapidly deployed increasing special operation forces enhancing explosive ordinance judicature capabilities enhancing security and protection capabilities enhancing encompassing medical diagnostic, prevention and treatment capabilities to the soldiers increasing effort of counter-terrorism and deploying support infrastructure as just-in-time soldiers inventory.As fictional character of conjugation functional concepts, the redundancies require inter-dependencies in terms such as joint battle command, joint fires and effects, joint air and missile defense, joint force projection, and joint containment.QuestionIn an essay I read titled To What End Mili tary Power? by Robert J. Art he looks at how and when force should be used. He suggests that there are four purposes of using forces defensive, deterrent, compellent, and swaggering. Considering their usefulness today. What do you think Art means by his final quote that The best way to keep the peace is first to prepare for war?Military power or military assistance is not relevant to Americas policy. Rather military action is secondary even third to military assistance policy. This is due to internal administrative problems such as demilitarization or the commercialization of the military, political subversion, and not direct military attack is not in the official agenda of American military after its experience during Korean War.Globalization, in turn, opens up the door for the American to become vulnerable toward attacks from the global nations. Hence, our defense must be powerful.America is being put into a containment policy and is elevated to its commitment to defend other coun tries. It is compelling the military use in foreign policy.This policy increases the defense budget because it requires, besides military or defense equipment and accessories, administrative strategic and alliances in the forms of military commitments and military intervention.Question2 (145 words) What is redundancy and why is it necessary when looking at transformation of the military.Redundancy is to simulate the military administrative structure and functional concepts which was established early in the previous American warfare but with some modification.Some of the redundancies, with a transformation strategy, may include forcible entry of mounted forces, establishment and enhancement of battle command, enhancement of soldiers, platforms, and forces protection capabilities, enhancement of theatre support capabilities, deployment and support infrastructure.In addition, the key functional concepts of the military are the creation of modularity, tailored and multifunction forces that can be rapidly deployed increasing special operation forces enhancing explosive ordinance disposal capabilities enhancing security and protection capabilities enhancing comprehensive medical diagnostic, prevention and treatment capabilities to the soldiers increasing effort of counter-terrorism and deploying support infrastructure as just-in-time soldiers inventory.As part of joint functional concepts, the redundancies require inter-dependencies in terms such as joint battle command, joint fires and effects, joint air and missile defense, joint force projection, and joint containment.QuestionSome people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion As our society progressed, people are placing more emphasis on education. This is because many feel that education is the key for higher standard of living. With such belief in mind, many d ependent on school to give their children best education and expect children to be more rounded people.Thus, many blamed schools and our ducational system when a educated person turns to be harmful and destructive to society. Whereas, others hold the view that parents should be responsible for such cases. In my view, both family and schools are important in enforcing the right moral concept in children. There is no doubt that schools should be a place where to teach children moral concepts while naturing talents. Ideally, schools have the responsibility to guide children what is right and wrong.This is because children are usually too young to understand the consequences of being wrong, they always go according to their curiosity. Hence, schools should play a role as guidance or supervisor to constantly remind them what to do and not to do. Moreover, the fundamental and original purpose of school is establishing a constitution to guide and teach youths not only to be more knowledgea ble, but more importantly to be a better man who is useful and responsible to society. Therefore, schools have the responsibility to guide children and pull them back if they are on the wrong track.However, with increasing competitiveness among all the schools, more and more schools only emphasis on academic achievement of children in nowadays. This led to lack of moral education for children. Hence, schools should have the responsibility to instill moral senses in children, but it is increasingly neglected by our educators in nowadays. However, we should not fully blame schools for the responsibility of not teaching children the right moral senses, parents is equally important factor in developing ones character and moral.As a famous saying goes, parents are childrens first teacher. It is true that parents influences are much more powerful than schools. According to a report, two third of the criminals are from broken or brutal family. From psychological point of view, it is also m ore likely for a child to become a violent person if his parents are brutal. It is also possible for this child to hatred or resent towards society. Hence, it is clearly demonstrated that parents should hold the responsibility to teach children how to be good member of the society.Thus, it is undeniable that parents play a significant role in developing ones moral concept. Question nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? With the invention of communication technology, our daily life has been greatly reshaped in many aspects. People seem to be more dependent on communication technology such as telephones, internet.Many was then questioned that technology has made us to be stranger to each other. However, the supporters of technology development defend that technology has benefited us in many ways. In my view, tech nology has enabled us to have a closer relationship than before. Critics often argue that technology has made us to be stranger to each other. It is observed there s less face to face interaction between people. This is because people see little needs for them to communicate face to face with the presence of communication technology.Communication technology allows us to send our messages instantaneously and conveniently. Thus, many people, especially the youths are afraid of communicate with strangers or speak up in public. Therefore, it seems that people become less friendly towards their neighbour. Hence, communication technology indeed changed our relationship among neighbors. The communication technology does not only changed our neighborhood relationship, but also our family elationship. It is not uncommon for one to heard complains that children are less engaging in family interaction from parents.Many parents complained that children always play computer game instead of spend ing time with them. Many youths like to express their feelings or tell their secrets to online strangers rather than their family members. Hence, it appears that the relationship between family members is weakening. This can be further supported by a new report which conveyed a Japanese mother left her 5 moths old child starve to death as she was so indulged in computer games. This clearly demonstrated how technology has indeed affect the relationship we have now.However, it is undeniable that communication technology does improve our social relationship in one way or another. Communication technology such as internet enables us to keep in touch with our family and friends even from far distant. Web camera enables us to meet with our friends oversea and which in turn strengthens our friendships. Moreover, with presence of social networks such as Facebook and Twitters, we are now able to find more new friends within our social groups like schoolmates. It also allows us to find old fr iends whom e have previously lost contact.Thus, technology provide a platform for us to make more friends and widen our social cycles. Therefore, communication technology strengths and provide new opportunity for our relationships. In conclusion, without and the friends we make. Technology is like a coin which has two sides. However, it is merely a tool for us communicate. Hence, we should not blamed technology for changing our social life, but , in fact, it is the way we use it which changes our lifestyle.QuestionSome people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion As our society progressed, people are placing more emphasis on education. This is because many feel that education is the key for higher standard of living. With such belief in mind, many dependent on school to give their children best education and expect children to be m ore rounded people.Thus, many blamed schools and our ducational system when a educated person turns to be harmful and destructive to society. Whereas, others hold the view that parents should be responsible for such cases. In my view, both family and schools are important in enforcing the right moral concept in children. There is no doubt that schools should be a place where to teach children moral concepts while naturing talents. Ideally, schools have the responsibility to guide children what is right and wrong.This is because children are usually too young to understand the consequences of being wrong, they always go according to their curiosity. Hence, schools should play a role as guidance or supervisor to constantly remind them what to do and not to do. Moreover, the fundamental and original purpose of school is establishing a constitution to guide and teach youths not only to be more knowledgeable, but more importantly to be a better man who is useful and responsible to societ y. Therefore, schools have the responsibility to guide children and pull them back if they are on the wrong track.However, with increasing competitiveness among all the schools, more and more schools only emphasis on academic achievement of children in nowadays. This led to lack of moral education for children. Hence, schools should have the responsibility to instill moral senses in children, but it is increasingly neglected by our educators in nowadays. However, we should not fully blame schools for the responsibility of not teaching children the right moral senses, parents is equally important factor in developing ones character and moral.As a famous saying goes, parents are childrens first teacher. It is true that parents influences are much more powerful than schools. According to a report, two third of the criminals are from broken or brutal family. From psychological point of view, it is also more likely for a child to become a violent person if his parents are brutal. It is a lso possible for this child to hatred or resent towards society. Hence, it is clearly demonstrated that parents should hold the responsibility to teach children how to be good member of the society.Thus, it is undeniable that parents play a significant role in developing ones moral concept. Question nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? With the invention of communication technology, our daily life has been greatly reshaped in many aspects. People seem to be more dependent on communication technology such as telephones, internet.Many was then questioned that technology has made us to be stranger to each other. However, the supporters of technology development defend that technology has benefited us in many ways. In my view, technology has enabled us to have a closer relationship than before. Critics often argue that technology has made us to be stranger to each other. It is observed there s less face to face interaction between people. This is because people see little needs for them to communicate face to face with the presence of communication technology.Communication technology allows us to send our messages instantaneously and conveniently. Thus, many people, especially the youths are afraid of communicate with strangers or speak up in public. Therefore, it seems that people become less friendly towards their neighbour. Hence, communication technology indeed changed our relationship among neighbors. The communication technology does not only changed our neighborhood relationship, but also our family elationship. It is not uncommon for one to heard complains that children are less engaging in family interaction from parents.Many parents complained that children always play computer game instead of spending time with them. Many youths like to express their feelings or tell their secrets to online strangers rather than their family members. Hence, it appears that the relationship between family members is weakening. This can be further supported by a new report which conveyed a Japanese mother left her 5 moths old child starve to death as she was so indulged in computer games. This clearly demonstrated how technology has indeed affect the relationship we have now.However, it is undeniable that communication technology does improve our social relationship in one way or another. Communication technology such as internet enables us to keep in touch with our family and friends even from far distant. Web camera enables us to meet with our friends oversea and which in turn strengthens our friendships. Moreover, with presence of social networks such as Facebook and Twitters, we are now able to find more new friends within our social groups like schoolmates. It also allows us to find old friends whom e have previously lost contact.Thus, technology provide a platform for us to make more friends and widen our social cycles. Therefore, communication technology strengths and provide new opportunity for our relationships. In conclusion, without and the friends we make. Technology is like a coin which has two sides. However, it is merely a tool for us communicate. Hence, we should not blamed technology for changing our social life, but , in fact, it is the way we use it which changes our lifestyle.